Showing the single result
Price
Category
Promt Tags
AcademicIntegrity
Algorithms
BusinessFinance
BusinessGrowth
BusinessIntelligence
BusinessLeadership
BusinessStrategy
ComputerScience
ContentEditing
ContentOptimization
CustomerFeedback
DataAnalysis
DataStructures
DataVisualization
DigitalTransformation
EdTech
EducationalResearch
EntertainmentLaw
FamilyLaw
FinancialPlanning
Fitness Tracker
GlowNaturally
GreenInnovation
HigherEducation
HypothesisTesting
InnovationSummit
IntellectualProperty
InterviewPreparation
KeywordOptimization
MarketingStrategy
NetworkingOpportunities
ProfessionalDevelopment
ProfessionalGrowth
ProofreadingTips
PureRadiance
RenewableEnergy
SEOContent
StatisticalAnalysis
StudentEngagement
SustainableArchitecture
SustainableBeauty
TechInnovation
TimelessBeauty
TimelessGlow
UserExperience
Classification Metrics
Create a list of evaluation metrics
€19.04 – €24.11Price range: €19.04 through €24.11Evaluation Metrics for Classification Problems
- Accuracy
- Definition: The proportion of correct predictions (both true positives and true negatives) out of all predictions made.
- Formula:Accuracy=True Positives+True NegativesTotal PredictionsAccuracy=Total PredictionsTrue Positives+True Negatives
- Use Case: Suitable when the classes are balanced. However, it may be misleading in imbalanced datasets.
- Precision (Positive Predictive Value)
- Definition: The proportion of true positive predictions out of all positive predictions made by the model.
- Formula:Precision=True PositivesTrue Positives+False PositivesPrecision=True Positives+False PositivesTrue Positives
- Use Case: Precision is important when the cost of false positives is high (e.g., spam detection).
- Recall (Sensitivity, True Positive Rate)
- Definition: The proportion of true positive predictions out of all actual positives in the dataset.
- Formula:Recall=True PositivesTrue Positives+False NegativesRecall=True Positives+False NegativesTrue Positives
- Use Case: Recall is crucial when the cost of false negatives is high (e.g., medical diagnosis).
- F1-Score
- Definition: The harmonic mean of precision and recall, providing a balance between the two metrics.
- Formula:F1-Score=2×Precision×RecallPrecision+RecallF1-Score=2×Precision+RecallPrecision×Recall
- Use Case: Useful when you need a balance between precision and recall, especially in cases of class imbalance.
- Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC-ROC)
- Definition: AUC measures the ability of the model to distinguish between positive and negative classes, based on the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve.
- Use Case: The higher the AUC, the better the model is at distinguishing between the two classes. Useful for imbalanced datasets.
- Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUC-PR)
- Definition: AUC-PR is similar to AUC-ROC but focuses on the precision-recall trade-off. It is especially informative when the classes are imbalanced.
- Use Case: AUC-PR is preferred when the positive class is rare, as it focuses on the performance on the minority class.
- Logarithmic Loss (Log Loss)
- Definition: Log loss measures the uncertainty of the predictions based on the probability output. A lower log loss indicates better performance.
- Formula:Log Loss=−1N∑i=1N[yi⋅log(pi)+(1−yi)⋅log(1−pi)]Log Loss=−N1i=1∑N[yi⋅log(pi)+(1−yi)⋅log(1−pi)]where yiyi is the actual label and pipi is the predicted probability.
- Use Case: Suitable for models predicting probabilities rather than class labels. Common in logistic regression and neural networks.
- Confusion Matrix
- Definition: A table that summarizes the performance of a classification algorithm by showing the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives.
- Use Case: Useful for a deeper understanding of the errors made by the model.
- Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC)
- Definition: MCC is a measure of the quality of binary classifications, providing a value between -1 (perfect inverse prediction) and +1 (perfect prediction). A value of 0 indicates random guessing.
- Formula:MCC=TP×TN−FP×FN(TP+FP)(TP+FN)(TN+FP)(TN+FN)MCC=(TP+FP)(TP+FN)(TN+FP)(TN+FN)TP×TN−FP×FN
- Use Case: A good metric for imbalanced datasets, as it takes all four components (TP, TN, FP, FN) into account.
- Cohen’s Kappa
- Definition: Cohen’s Kappa is a statistic that measures inter-rater agreement for categorical items, correcting for the agreement that occurs by chance.
- Formula:κ=Po−Pe1−Peκ=1−PePo−Pewhere PoPo is the observed agreement and PePe is the expected agreement by chance.
- Use Case: Used to assess the reliability of classifiers, especially when multiple classifiers are involved.
Select options
This product has multiple variants. The options may be chosen on the product page